Incorporated County of Los Alamos

Local government

Based in NM

Share:𝕏LinkedInFacebook
🤖

AI Overview

With $40K in lobbying spend across 2 quarterly filings, Incorporated County of Los Alamos is an active lobbying client. Their lobbying covers 2 issue areas.

$40K
Total Spend
1
Years Active
1
Firms Hired
4
Lobbyists Deployed
2
Issues Lobbied

Spending Trend

View as table
YearLobbying Spend
2025$40K

Issues Lobbied

Budget/AppropriationsEnergy

Lobbying Firms

Cogent Strategies LLC

Lobbyists

Regina MahonyAndrew KaudersShellie PurvisRandall Gerard

What They Lobby About

These are actual descriptions from their quarterly lobbying disclosure filings, summarizing what they lobbied Congress and federal agencies about.Issue areas: Budget/Appropriations, Energy

  • •General issues related to Homeland Security appropriations; general issues related to national labs.
  • •- Issues related to Homeland Security appropriations - Issues related to national labs - Issues related to energy and water development and related agencies appropriations

Related Analysis

📈 Client Trajectories
See how this client compares to others over time
🎯 Market Concentration
How concentrated is the lobbying market?
🚀 Spending Momentum
Which issues are surging right now?

Related Investigations

The 22,000% ROI
When lobbying spending yields outsized returns.
Federal Lobbying Statistics 2025
The definitive stats — $37.7B total, industry breakdowns, and trends.
What Is Lobbying? A Complete Guide
How lobbying works, who does it, and why it matters.

Similar Clients

University of New Mexico
$1.2M total spend
X-bow Launch Systems INC. DBA X-bow Systems INC.
$750K total spend
Space Nuclear Power Corporation
$410K total spend
City of Carlsbad, New Mexico
$270K total spend
County of Eddy
$270K total spend

Explore More

← All Clients⚖️ Compare Clients💵 ROI Calculator🔍 Investigations📖 How Lobbying Works🕸️ Network Analysis🏛️ Agency Pressure

Data Sources: Senate LDA Filings

Last updated: February 2026

This site is an independent journalism project. Analysis and editorial content are not affiliated with or endorsed by any government agency.