Hazim Nada

Energy & commodity trading

Based in TX

Share:𝕏LinkedInFacebook
🤖

AI Overview

With $250K in lobbying spend across 4 quarterly filings, Hazim Nada is an active lobbying client. Their lobbying covers 1 issue area.

$250K
Total Spend
1
Years Active
1
Firms Hired
3
Lobbyists Deployed
1
Issues Lobbied

Spending Trend

View as table
YearLobbying Spend
2025$250K

Issues Lobbied

Trade

Lobbying Firms

Valcour LLC

Lobbyists

Matthew MowersBlake CenterWilliam Killion

Government Agencies Targeted

These are the government entities that Hazim Nada disclosed contacting in their lobbying filings.

Commerce, Dept of (DOC)HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESNatl Security Council (NSC)SENATEState, Dept of (DOS)Vice President of the U.S.
View all agency pressure data →

What They Lobby About

These are actual descriptions from their quarterly lobbying disclosure filings, summarizing what they lobbied Congress and federal agencies about.Issue areas: Trade

Engagement with US Government involving business dispute abroad

International business dispute

Related Analysis

📈 Client Trajectories
See how this client compares to others over time
🎯 Market Concentration
How concentrated is the lobbying market?
🚀 Spending Momentum
Which issues are surging right now?

Related Investigations

The 2025 Tariff Panic
As tariffs return, lobbying on trade surges.
Federal Lobbying Statistics 2025
The definitive stats — $37.7B total, industry breakdowns, and trends.
What Is Lobbying? A Complete Guide
How lobbying works, who does it, and why it matters.

Similar Clients

Advanced Micro Devices, INC.
$29.5M total spend
Vistra Corporate Services Company (FKA Vistra Corp.)
$9.8M total spend
Texas Farm Bureau
$9.5M total spend
Keurig Dr Pepper INC.
$4.5M total spend
Marathon Oil Corporation
$4.3M total spend

Explore More

← All Clients⚖️ Compare Clients💵 ROI Calculator🔍 Investigations📖 How Lobbying Works🕸️ Network Analysis🏛️ Agency Pressure

Data Sources: Senate LDA Filings

Last updated: February 2026

This site is an independent journalism project. Analysis and editorial content are not affiliated with or endorsed by any government agency.