Gpa Midstream Association

Based in OK

Share:𝕏LinkedInFacebook
🤖

AI Overview

With $1.7M in lobbying spend across 34 quarterly filings, Gpa Midstream Association is a significant lobbying presence. Their lobbying covers 8 issue areas. Active from 2018 to 2025.

$1.7M
Total Spend
8
Years Active
1
Firms Hired
4
Lobbyists Deployed
8
Issues Lobbied

Spending Trend

View as table
YearLobbying Spend
2018$180K
2019$200K
2020$200K
2021$200K
2022$200K
2023$200K
2024$250K
2025$250K

Issues Lobbied

EnvironmentTransportationEnergyClean Air & WaterNatural ResourcesHomeland SecurityLabor IssuesTrade

Lobbying Firms

Gpa Midstream Association

Lobbyists

Matthew HiteCharlotte SawyerAndrew MooneyStuart Saulters

Government Agencies Targeted

These are the government entities that Gpa Midstream Association disclosed contacting in their lobbying filings.

Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers)Bureau of Land Management (BLM)Commerce, Dept of (DOC)Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)Energy, Dept ofEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESInterior, Dept of (DOI)Office of Management & Budget (OMB)Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety AdministrationSENATEU.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS)U.S. Forest ServiceSmall Business Administration (SBA)U.S. Chemical Safety & Hazard Investigation BoardWhite House OfficeCenters For Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)Homeland Security, Dept of (DHS)+5 more
View all agency pressure data →

What They Lobby About

These are actual descriptions from their quarterly lobbying disclosure filings, summarizing what they lobbied Congress and federal agencies about.Issue areas: Environment, Transportation, Energy, Clean Air & Water, Natural Resources and 3 more

Regulatory Accountability Act of 2017

H.R. 5 The Regulatory Accountability Act

CEQ Greenhouse Gas NEPA Guidance

USFS NEPA Issues in general

EPA's proposed rule to add Gas Processing Plants to the Tox

Pipeline Issues in general

PHMSA Safety of Gas Transmission and Gathering Pipelines Rulemaking

PHMSA Safety of Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Rulemaking

PHMSA Safety of Underground Natural Gas Storage Fac

Natural Gas Gathering issues in general

H.R. 2910 Promoting Interagency Coordination for Review of Natural Gas Pipelines Act

FERC Quorum

H.R. 3117 and S. 1512 Transparency and Honesty in Energy Regul

Army Corps of Engineers regional conditions for Nationwide Permits

CWA Nationwide Permits

EPA NAAQS for Ozone

2015 NAAQS for Ozone

EPA's Waters of the US

EPA's Methane Regulations for the Oil and Natu

USFWS Endangered Species Act Issues Generally

USFWS Substantial Finding and Status Review for the Lesser Prairie Chicken

BLM Onshore Orders #3, #4, and #5

BLM Venting and Flaring Rule

H.J. Res 56 BLM

Related Analysis

📈 Client Trajectories
See how this client compares to others over time
🎯 Market Concentration
How concentrated is the lobbying market?
🚀 Spending Momentum
Which issues are surging right now?

Related Investigations

The 2025 Tariff Panic
As tariffs return, lobbying on trade surges.
Federal Lobbying Statistics 2025
The definitive stats — $37.7B total, industry breakdowns, and trends.
What Is Lobbying? A Complete Guide
How lobbying works, who does it, and why it matters.

Similar Clients

Arcelormittal North America Holdings LLC and its US Subsidiaries
$1.6M total spend
Lighthouse Resources INC. and its Subsidiaries
$1.1M total spend
Enable Midstream Partners, LP
$750K total spend
Calportland Corporation
$530K total spend
Flogistix, LP
$210K total spend

Explore More

← All Clients⚖️ Compare Clients💵 ROI Calculator🔍 Investigations📖 How Lobbying Works🕸️ Network Analysis🏛️ Agency Pressure

Data Sources: Senate LDA Filings

Last updated: February 2026

This site is an independent journalism project. Analysis and editorial content are not affiliated with or endorsed by any government agency.